new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f15f581
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+---
+confidence: medium
+related:
+- wiki/themes/existential-risk-and-spa-diplomacy.md
+- wiki/themes/vision-for-the-world.md
+sources:
+- raw/transcript.md
+title: Spa Diplomacy
+type: project
+visibility: public
+---
+
+# Spa Diplomacy
+
+Half-joke, half-thesis. The maximally-disarming proposal for international relations.
+
+## The pitch
+
+> "Take the military budget. Go to Iran and say, look, we've got two options. You can do war with us, or spas everywhere, for everybody. You can choose the options."
+
+The literal shape:
+- Redirect a substantial fraction of the military budget into building **wellness infrastructure** (spas, wellness centers, restorative-yoga retreats) at scale
+- Offer the same to adversary nations, not as cultural imperialism but as a swap
+- Claim that **at the spa, we're not fighting**
+
+## Why it's only half a joke
+
+Behind the gag:
+
+> "We just want to all get along, guys. Seems so obvious, but it's so hard in reality."
+
+> "I mean, challenging political leadership is a different problem. But the question is: what's the marginal cost to produce a mass mutiny? It literally all went into building spas. Spa diplomacy."
+
+Three real claims under the gag:
+
+1. **The marginal cost of mass mutiny is finite.** If a regime offers war and the population is offered spas, the population at some scale of offer flips. The question is the threshold.
+2. **Material aggression is largely an artifact of stress.** Stressed populations produce aggressive politics. Less stressed populations don't. So **stress-reduction infrastructure is military infrastructure** in the deeper sense.
+3. **Demilitarization is not the same as defenselessness.** Edge cases exist. But the marginal redeployment of military spending toward stress-reduction infrastructure dominates the marginal expenditure on incremental military hardware in expected-utility terms.
+
+David: "I guess there isn't much practical utility for a military if everyone gets along. Although I guess you still have to control for edge cases."
+
+Jacob: "Yeah, edge cases are nice."
+
+## Why this matters now
+
+The [[Existential Risk and Spa Diplomacy|existential-risk argument]]: as the marginal cost of bioweapons drops, the doomsday clock moves toward midnight. The cliff is structural, not adversary-specific. Conventional military deterrence doesn't help against decentralized small-actor weaponry; **deep coordination** does.
+
+Spa diplomacy is the maximally-friendly framing of the deep-coordination thesis. The same logic supports less spa-flavored policies (international cultural exchange, joint research programs, mutual de-escalation infrastructure).
+
+## What's actually being proposed
+
+If you take the gag seriously:
+
+- **Population-scale wellness infrastructure** as a deliberate civilizational investment
+- **Cross-border** — built jointly with adversary nations as a confidence-building measure
+- **Parity** — both sides get the spa, no cultural-imperialist imposition
+- **Reframe of "defense"** — protecting people *from* the conditions that make them aggressive, rather than from each other
+
+It's not entirely without precedent. Marshall Plan, postwar Japan reconstruction, EU integration after WWII — all had a "let's build instead of fight" structure that turned out to work.
+
+## Status
+
+Not a real ongoing project of Jacob's, as far as the transcript shows. But it's a coherent frame and shows up multiple times. Worth a page because it's the **mood** of the larger vision compressed into a quotable form.
+
+`confidence: medium` — high that Jacob said it, medium that he'd defend it as a literal policy proposal vs. a vivid framing of the deep-coordination thesis.
+
+## Related
+
+- [[Existential Risk and Spa Diplomacy]] — the longer treatment
+- [[Vision for the World]] — the larger frame
+- [[Healing Arts Grant]] — the personal-scale version of the same logic
\ No newline at end of file